Effectiveness Of Bt

J.Whitaker-ThomasCounty

It’s been easy for me to take for granted not having to count bollworms in cotton with Bt technology. UGA Entomologist Dr. Phillip Roberts discusses Bt traits at meetings, but don’t have to get in depth because of how effective the technology is for us. After our cotton field day yesterday, UGA Agronomist Dr. Jared Whitaker and I looked at plots for a while. It was a great learning experience for me as he was showing me to how to actually scout for bollworms and make seeing some damage.

Tobacco budworm and corn earworm make up the Heliothine complex. Though they are different insects, they appear similar in the egg and larval stage. Three generations of tobacco budworm infest cotton each year and two generations of corn earworm occur each year. ID is important since TBW are resistant to pyrethroid class of insecticides. But susceptibility of CEW to pyrethroids has declined in recent years.

We have Bollguard II, Widestrike, Twinlink, and Widestrike III technologies of Bt. The difference between technologies is how much they are expressed throughout the plant. Bt is not immune from economic damage from caterpillars and don’t have actually on regular bugs (Stink bugs & plant bugs). TBW are actually more susceptible to Bt than CEW (and other worms).

Scouting

Dr. Whitaker showed me how to look for caterpillars. Since the flower has the least expression of Bt, if the moth lays an egg in the flower, it can hatch and feed. Once it feeds outside this, Bt should kill the caterpillar. We were seeing some larger bollworms and bollworms moving from one boll to another.

Since it takes the eggs three days to hatch, it’s best to look in pink flowers. Pull the petals back and look for a very tiny black-headed worm, OR you may see a black dot where the worm “hit” the edge of the boll. You can also look for a flared square. Here are some pictures of all of this we saw yesterday.

Hit from bollworm

Hit from bollworm

Bollworm Hatchout

Bollworm Hatchout

Flared square

Flared square

Bollworm 018

Leave a comment

Filed under Entomology, Cotton

Peanut Maturity

We’re getting closer to looking at peanuts to check maturity. I checked my first sample yesterday. We were really just wanting to see how far away we were to make decisions on last fungicides. Peanuts looked further along than expected.

PeanutMaturitySample-PlantedApril27 002

These 06G’s were planted April 27th and 28th, and show a maturity between 14 and  days away. We didn’t have a perfect representative sample, so this may affect it. Peanuts mature based on temperature and available moisture. With high temperatures since June, questions have been about crops maturing early. UGA Agronomist Dr. Scott Monfort says this won’t necessarily affect everything the same. For instance, our early April planted peanuts (in cooler temperature) will stall, then later April planted peanuts will mature faster. Every field situation is going to be different, so sampling is the best way to really know.

In this sample, I was finding a lot ‘turning loose’ in the hull. We need to remember to crack open the pods to observe the funiculous. This is the umbilical cord that connects the kernel to the pod. Once it turns loose, the next rain can make them sprout.

Sometimes it’s hard to see the ‘umbilical cord’ before you break it yourself. Another way to make this observation is just look at the kernel. If the kernel is white with few oil spots, it’s still feeding. If the kernel is dark and shriveled, it has turned loose. I took a picture of these two. They are not always this easy to tell, but looking at them this way has helped me. I start on the right side (mature pods) and work my way back. I cracked 35 pods in this same and 6 were turned loose. 17% is pretty significant.

Top peanut still feeding; bottom peanut turned loose in the hull

Top peanut still feeding; bottom peanut turned loose in the hull

Sampling Procedure

Growers, make sure you have a good representative sample. Get plants from at least 3 spots in the field. Also, don’t just pick off the larger pods. We really need to pick off small pods as well. If we pick off large pods, it can bias the sample toward digging early. There is enough data to show that we lose as much as yield if we dig a week early than a week late. If we dig a week late, there is no difference. We don’t see difference again until we dig 2 weeks too late. We still have to consider the condition of the vines. Definitely look at the vines well as you pull off pods. Also, 180 – 200 pods is good for a sample.

Prevent Digging Losses

Miller County Ag Agent, Brock Ward was talking with me about losses just from the digger. He went back and found good information from former UGA Agronomist Dr. John Beasley on digging losses that I think is good to share:

You can do everything just right during the season to maximize yield and grade potential but blow it all at harvest.  It is very easy to lose several hundred pounds per acre in yield by not being careful when digging. Growers need to take their time and set the digger-shaker up properly and then run at the proper ground speed to maximize digging and inverting efficiency.

In 1990, Dr. Mike Bader and I conducted a digging efficiency trial at the Sunbelt Expo Farm. We had a replicated trial in which we dug as close to perfect as possible, too fast, too slow, too shallow, and too far left or right. We took an area the width of the planted bed (6 feet) by 3 feet in length from each plot within the trial and collected pods on the soil surface and from the top three inches of the soil. We threw out the obviously diseased or non-harvestable pods, and weighed the harvestable pods that would have yielded and graded.

Even where we dug as close to perfect as possible we calculated losing approximately 120 pounds per acre. We know that producers do not harvest too shallow on purpose, but if they are not paying attention the digger blades can ride up more shallow if the soil is too hard. We measured pod yield losses in the range of 1,000-1,200 pounds per acre in the too shallow, too far left or right, and the too fast treatments.

Bottom line is that digging losses can take a significant chunk of yield potential. Another critical factor is to make sure they are using sharp digger blades. A set of digger blades is usually good for a limited number of acres, depending on soil type. On the heavier soils 15-20 acres may be the limit on a set of digger blades so check them often to make sure they are wearing evenly.  Growers need to be very careful at digging to reduce harvest losses.

Leave a comment

Filed under Peanuts

UGA Heifer Evaluation & Reproductive Development Field Day – August 31

Online or mail in registration is available. There will be on site registrations but, if anyone can register now, it’ll help with planning.

The cost is $25 per person. Lunch will served and notebooks with slide presentations will be available. CLICK HERE to register.

UGAHeiferEvaluationandReproductiveFieldDay

Leave a comment

Filed under Livestock

Ultra-Late Soybeans Look Good

BrandonBarnes-Soybean-Pioneer95Y70 002

Here is a look at some of Brandon Barnes’s ultra-late soybeans that are looking very good. This is Pioneer 95Y70s, planted behind sweet corn on June 20th. Ultra-late soybeans can  be risky, but something to consider for income and our environment.

Planting date is probably biggest issue.Traditional research has shown that we lose 0.75 bushel/acre when planting mid June to July. UGA Agronomist Dr. Jared Whitaker says initial work in the ultra-late system is losses planting goes into August, the best educational guess as to cutoff date is first week of August.

Dr. Whitaker also likes narrow rows. This row spacing is set at 20 inches. We need to also have 175K – 200K seed population. Brandon planted at 200K seed population. A little nitrogen in this system doesn’t hurt either. Though soybeans don’t need supplemental nitrogen if properly inoculated, the window for growth in this system likely takes away ability to produce enough N.

We definitely need irrigation in this system. Brandon is now putting out close to 2 inches of water per week as soybeans are entering the reproductive growth stage. Once flowering occurs, we are in reproductive growth stage. The plant will go from R1 to R8. Below is a chart on growth stages. These are important when we look at pests.

SoybeanReproductiveGrowthStages-UGAHandbook-2015

SoybeanReproductiveGrowthStages

Disease

Asian soybean rust has been found in the county on Kudzu. They’ve already treated with fungicide on this field. We are not considered safe from ASR until we get to R6 growth stage (seeds are touching in the pod).

Insect

BrandonBarnes-Soybean-Pioneer95Y70 007

Once we hit reproductive growth, our insect thresholds change. They’ve treated for caterpillars already, but we noticed lots of leaf damage still. We can have 30% defoliation before bloom. After bloom our threshold is down to 15%. We also want to check caterpillars since soybean loopers have pyrethroid resistance. Brandon and I found some soybean loopers, but no green cloverworms or velvetbean caterpillars. UGA Entomologist Dr. Phillip Roberts says green cloverworms are rarely at high enough levels to treat. They usually appear early and serve as host for insect parasites and predators.

We can terminate our insecticide applications when we hit R7 (leaves turning yellow.)

Foliage Feeder Thresholds Soybeans

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Entomology, Soybeans, Disease

Cotton Variety Field Day – August 25th

We’re calling it a field day, but it won’t last longer than an hour or hour and a half. We have 11 DRYLAND varieties planted on the corner of Maddox Road and McMillian Road west of Ochlocknee. We will meet at 9:00 in the morning and industry representatives will tell us about their varieties. Dr. Whitaker will discuss defoliation. Everyone can take a look and ask questions and observe as much as they like.

CottonFieldDay-2016

Leave a comment

Filed under Cotton

2016 Update On Stored Grain Protectants

UGA Entomologist Dr. Mike Toews is getting questions about treating shelled corn as it goes into storage. Here is updated information on products and efficacy from my recent tests in Georgia.

Actellic 5E (labeled for corn) – This is the standard product for shelled corn, but it is also the most expensive product to purchase. A full rate (12.3 oz  per 1000 bu) will provide protection from weevils for at least 9 months, but reducing the rate will decrease the longevity of the protection. Actellic is susceptible to heat breakdown.

Centynal (labeled for corn and wheat) – Centynal is fairly inexpensive and will provide 3 to 6 months protection from weevils. It is critical to apply a full rate (8.5 oz  per 1000 bu) or weevil control will be compromised. This material may also be used for treatment of empty bins.

Diacon (labeled for corn and wheat) – Diacon is an insect growth regulator that is effective at killing immature grain moths and beetles, except weevils. The 4 oz per 1000 bu rate is sufficient for tank mixing. 

Storcide II (labeled for wheat) – Storcide II is an excellent option for stored wheat, but is not labelled for use on corn.

Malathion (labeled for wheat and corn) – This product has been widely used in the past, but is not currently recommended due to well documented resistance in many stored grain insect populations.

Tempo SC (labeled for empty bin use only) – Tempo is an excellent material for treating empty bins and elevator boots, but is not labeled for application directly to grain.

Three-way tankmix – Tests from 2015 showed that a three way tank mix of Centynal (8.5 oz) plus Diacon IGR (4 oz) plus PBO-8 Synergist (13.5 oz) will provide 6-9 months of protection from weevils.  This is a moderately priced option for growers in markets where other products arSilose unavailable or cost is a limiting factor.

Regardless of the product used, please be mindful that grain protectants are not a silver bullet. Applications should only be made to cooled grain (do not apply before sending grain through the dryer) that will be stored for more than 3 months.  Apply protectants at the bottom of the auger so the kernels have a good chance to contact the insecticide while moving up to the top of the bin.  Long-term grain storage also requires grain at an appropriate moisture content, proper housekeeping, use of a spreader when filling bins, and managed aeration.

Additional information is available in the 2016 Georgia Pest Management Handbook or in a recent Extension Publication (http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/I/IPM-0330/IPM-0330.pdf) that Dr. Kathy Flanders at Auburn University and I authored earlier this year.

Leave a comment

Filed under Corn, Grain

2016 Silage Trial Variety

CornSilageHarvest 012

It’s always long, hot day when many of us agents come together to help plant and harvest the Brooks County Silage Variety trials. I went to help them harvest a few weeks ago. County Agents Ben Shirley and Stephanie Hollifield did a great job coordinating the harvest. Ben and intern, Meghan were in the field cutting silage. Stephanie was in the weigh house taking tonnage. Lowndes County Agent Mihasha Dowdy and I were in ‘the pit’ collecting silage samples which are sent to receive milk producing capabilities. Below is the data shared by Brooks County Agent Ben Shirley on their Brooks County Ag Connection blog I wanted to pass along.

I want to share results obtained from the Brooks County 2016 Corn Silage Variety trial.  We planted this trial on April 25th and harvested 14 weeks later on July 27th.  This year’s trial included 69 replications, 23 varieties replicated three times each. There were no significant differences in yield among planted varieties. The varieties are ranked according to two different parameters, lbs. of milk/acre and green tons @35% moisture/acre. We conduct this trial annually, in order to assist our Dairymen and growers with variety selection and planting decisions pertaining to silage production.  We would like to thank our cooperators, sponsors, and seed companies for their support and assistance.  All data collected is available at (the Brooks County) office, please call or e-mail us if you would like additional copies or if you have any questions. Also, I have provided a link to view the data in its entirety.

2016-silage-results

Note* Keep in mind no significant differences were found between the varieties; ranking of varieties is from highest to lowest only.

Note* DKC67-88 only replicated 2 times, all others replicated 3 times.

Our view from the pit.

Our view from the pit.

Lowndes County Agent Mihasha Dowdy collects a silage sample

Lowndes County Agent Mihasha Dowdy collects a silage sample

2016SilageTrialHarvest 001

Leave a comment

Filed under Corn